The investigation into the NEET UG 2026 paper leak case has taken another significant turn. New details emerging from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe have raised serious questions about the security and confidentiality of one of India’s most important medical entrance examinations.
According to reports, the son of a coaching centre owner told investigators that an NTA-appointed Chemistry subject expert allegedly dictated 132 Chemistry questions along with their answers to him during special classes held before the NEET UG examination.
The allegation is particularly serious because NEET UG determines admission to undergraduate medical courses across India. For lakhs of students who spend months or even years preparing for the examination, any possible breach in question-paper confidentiality can directly affect trust in the examination system.
What Did the CBI Investigation Reveal?
According to the investigation details reported by The Indian Express, the 18-year-old son of Shivraj Raghunath Motegaonkar, owner of Renukai Career Coaching Institute in Latur, reportedly gave an important statement to the CBI.
Motegaonkar is among the key accused in the case.
The student reportedly told investigators that his father asked him to visit Siddhivinayak Hospital in Latur and meet a Chemistry teacher who was described to him as a NEET expert.
What followed has now become an important part of the investigation.
The student allegedly attended special Chemistry sessions on April 18, April 19 and April 22, shortly before the NEET UG examination that was conducted on May 3.
Special Classes Allegedly Held Inside a Hospital
One of the most unusual aspects of the case is the location where these sessions allegedly took place.
According to the student’s statement cited in the investigation, the classes were conducted on the third floor of Siddhivinayak Hospital in Latur.
The Chemistry teacher was later identified as Pralhad Vithalrao Kulkarni, an NTA Chemistry subject expert.
The student reportedly told investigators that Kulkarni carried papers during the sessions and dictated Chemistry questions and their answers. The student then wrote them down in his notebook.
Each session reportedly lasted around one-and-a-half to two hours.
Across the three sessions, the student claimed that he wrote down a total of 132 Chemistry questions with answers.
These claims are part of the CBI investigation and chargesheet, and should therefore be understood as allegations being examined through the legal process.
Why Are the 132 Questions Important?
The number itself makes this development significant.
For an ordinary NEET aspirant, receiving a list of expected questions from a teacher may not necessarily seem unusual. Coaching institutes regularly provide practice papers, important questions and revision material.
The concern in this case comes from the alleged source of the questions.
If confidential examination material was accessed or shared by an individual involved in the examination-setting process, it would represent a much more serious breach than ordinary prediction-based coaching material.
The CBI investigation is therefore looking at the circumstances in which these questions were allegedly provided and their connection to the examination.
Student Reportedly Scored 117 Marks in Chemistry
Another interesting detail has emerged from the student’s statement.
He reportedly told investigators that his father would check the notebook after he returned from the special classes. However, according to his account, his father was apparently not fully convinced about the questions.
As a result, the student claimed that he did not memorise the entire set.
He eventually scored 117 out of 180 marks in Chemistry.
The student reportedly told investigators that he believed he could have scored full marks in Chemistry had he trusted and memorised the list.
This statement is one of the details investigators are reportedly examining while reconstructing what happened before the examination.
What Happened to the Notebook?
Naturally, one of the most important pieces of potential evidence would have been the notebook in which the 132 questions were allegedly written.
According to the report, the CBI questioned the student about its whereabouts.
The student reportedly said that after the NEET UG examination was completed, he sold his notebooks to a scrap dealer.
This means investigators have had to rely on other forms of evidence, witness statements and investigative leads to understand what allegedly happened during those sessions.
Hospital Staff Also Questioned
The CBI probe has not been limited to the student and the accused individuals.
Investigators also reportedly recorded the statement of a receptionist working at Siddhivinayak Hospital.
The receptionist was questioned about visitor records at the hospital. According to the report, investigators were told that the hospital did not maintain records for general visitors and only maintained entries relating to patients.
The student also reportedly identified people connected to the alleged meetings during the investigation.
These statements form part of the larger chain of evidence being examined by the agency.
CBI Chargesheet Names 13 Accused
The investigation has now reached an important legal stage.
According to the report, the CBI filed its chargesheet on July 28, 2026, before a Delhi fast-track court.
The chargesheet reportedly names 13 accused and lists around 360 witnesses.
The wider investigation has focused on whether the alleged leak involved a coordinated network rather than an isolated act. Recent reports on the chargesheet have alleged involvement of NTA-appointed subject experts along with other individuals.
However, the allegations will ultimately have to be tested through the judicial process before criminal responsibility is established.
Why the NEET UG Paper Leak Case Matters to Students
The biggest issue goes beyond the individuals named in the investigation.
NEET UG is a highly competitive examination where even a small difference in marks can significantly affect a student’s rank, counselling opportunities and chances of securing a medical seat.
Students prepare under enormous academic pressure. Families also invest considerable time, money and emotional energy into NEET preparation.
That is why examination integrity is essential.
Every candidate should enter the examination hall knowing that everyone is competing under the same conditions. Any possibility that certain candidates received confidential material beforehand can damage confidence in the entire process.
Need for Stronger Examination Security
The NEET UG 2026 paper leak case also highlights the need for stronger security at every stage of a national-level examination.
Security cannot begin only when question papers reach examination centres. Confidentiality needs to be protected from the stage of question creation and moderation to finalisation, printing, transportation, storage and distribution.
Access to sensitive examination material should ideally follow strict need-to-know protocols, with strong digital and physical monitoring.
Authorities may also need to continuously review how subject experts are selected, how confidential material is accessed and whether the same individuals have unnecessary access across multiple stages of paper preparation.
What Happens Next?
The filing of a chargesheet does not mean the legal process is over.
The allegations, witness statements and evidence collected by the CBI will now be examined through court proceedings. The accused will also have the opportunity to present their defence.
For students and parents, the most important outcome will be whether the investigation leads to stronger safeguards for future examinations.
The NEET UG examination carries the dreams of lakhs of aspiring doctors. Protecting its credibility is therefore not simply an administrative responsibility—it is essential to ensuring that every student gets a fair opportunity based on preparation and performance.
Conclusion
The latest developments in the NEET UG 2026 paper leak case have brought renewed attention to the security of India’s medical entrance examination system.
The allegation that an NTA Chemistry subject expert dictated 132 questions and answers to the son of a coaching centre owner before the examination is now an important part of the CBI’s case.
While the courts will determine responsibility based on the evidence presented, the episode highlights a larger lesson: competitive examinations can maintain public trust only when confidentiality, transparency and accountability remain uncompromised.
For NEET aspirants, a fair examination is not an added benefit—it is the foundation on which the entire admission process depends.
Book your Free consultancy: 9350777177 / https://reliablestudy.com/
– Content Writer and SEO – Riya Singh
All right reserved – Reliable Study / https://reliablestudy.com/
FAQs
The CBI probe reportedly found that an NTA Chemistry expert allegedly dictated 132 questions and answers to a coaching centre owner’s son before the exam.
According to the student’s statement cited in the investigation, 132 Chemistry questions and answers were dictated during three sessions.
The sessions were reportedly conducted at Siddhivinayak Hospital in Latur, Maharashtra.
The CBI chargesheet reportedly names 13 accused and cites around 360 witnesses.
No. The chargesheet has been filed, but the allegations and evidence still have to go through the judicial process.